lunes, 3 de marzo de 2008

True Or Not True

In this chapter we see how the final and only veredict is given and how he has the ocnversation with the father about god and about he should hold on to god to get over everything about jail. We see how in a moment his lawyer says about the trial that he didnt understand if they were really triyng him because of a murder or because he was bad wih his mother. But I think these two events are pretty connectd because one thing has to do with the other because its a way to prove his attitude towards life and how he approaches thigns so its obvious that they included that into the trial. Everyone knew he had killed the guy so they had to prove if it had been in self defense or notand what a better wya to prove it than to prove that his personality was going to let him act the way he did. And the best exaple for it was the way he acted with his mother because if he acted like that with his mother then it had to be obvious that he was going to be able to hurt anyone wothout any remorse.

1 comentario:

J. Tangen dijo...

The two events are absolutely connected. Try separating your ideas into paragraphs. Also, quote text to support your points. Watch capitalization.

2
3
1